Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (37)
- Conference Proceeding (24)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Book (2)
Institute
- Forschungszentrum Energie (66) (remove)
Language
- English (59)
- German (6)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (66) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (66)
Keywords
- Demand side management (4)
- Grid balancing (3)
- Optimization (3)
- Distributed storage (2)
- Domestic hot water heater (2)
- Heat pump (2)
- Organic Rankine Cycle (2)
- Tomography (2)
- +WAA 300 (1)
- +WBH 725 (1)
- Automotive application (1)
- Autonomous control (1)
- Autonomous optimization (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Batteries (1)
- Battery (1)
- Battery storage (1)
- Bilge water (1)
- COSMO-RS (1)
- Cellulose Fiber Solar Cell (1)
- Civil Engineering (1)
- Classical Continuum Physics (1)
- Clathrate Hydrates (1)
- Coal (1)
- Colloidal films (1)
- Color (1)
- Controlling : Allgemeines (1)
- Credit risk (1)
- D52 (1)
- D53 (1)
- Data mining (1)
- Demand Side Management (1)
- Demand response (1)
- Desalination (1)
- Dupuit–Forchheimer (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Economics general (1)
- Electric vehicle (1)
- Electric vehicles (1)
- Electrodes (1)
- Endogenous risk (1)
- Finanzwirtschaft (1)
- Fluid Flow (1)
- G01 (1)
- G33 (1)
- Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences (1)
- Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences (1)
- HDH (1)
- Heat transfer (1)
- Hole-transport layer (1)
- Hot Water Heater (1)
- Hydrogen (1)
- Hydrogeology (1)
- Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering (1)
- Inverse problem (1)
- Iron oxide (1)
- Lattice Boltzmann (1)
- Li (1)
- Light-emitting diodes (1)
- Looping cycle (1)
- Materials (1)
- Measurement by laser beam (1)
- Model predictive control (MPC) (1)
- Modeling (1)
- Monte Carlo Ray Tracing (1)
- Monte-Carlo ray tracing (1)
- Multi-criteria evaluation (1)
- Navier–Stokes (1)
- Optimum charging strategy (1)
- Organic solar cells (1)
- PV (1)
- Peak demand (1)
- Permeability (1)
- Phosphor layer (1)
- Photocurrent mapping (1)
- Porosity (1)
- Porous (1)
- Prediction error method (1)
- PubChem (1)
- Quantum dot lasers (1)
- Quantum dots (1)
- Repurposed (1)
- Repurposed vehicle ZEBRA battery (1)
- Second use (1)
- Self‐passivation (1)
- Solar reactor (1)
- Spatial inhomogeneity (1)
- State estimation (1)
- Surface potential distribution (1)
- Syngas (1)
- System identification (1)
- Temperature measurement (1)
- Textile (1)
- Thermal energy storage (1)
- Thermochemical (1)
- Thermochemical fuel production (1)
- Unidirectional communication (1)
- Vehicle batteries (1)
- Wastewater treatment (1)
- Working fluid (1)
- X-rays (1)
- distribution generation (1)
- distribution grids (1)
- environmental degradation (1)
- flow in porous media (1)
- hosting capacity (1)
- low voltage grids (1)
- mesh generation (1)
- multiscale (1)
- organic solar cells (1)
- parallel microdiodes (1)
- pejoPapers (1)
- photocurrent mapping (1)
- printed (1)
- scroll expander (1)
- silicon carbide (1)
- small scale (1)
- sol‐gel processing (1)
- spatial homogeneity (1)
- surface termination (1)
- waste heat recovery (1)
In contrast to fossil energy sources, the supply by renewable energy sources likewind and photovoltaics can not be controlled. Therefore, flexibilities on the demandside of the electric power grid, like electro-chemical energy storage systems, are usedincreasingly to match electric supply and demand at all times. To control those flex-ibilities, we consider two algorithms that both lead to linear programming problems.These are solved autonomously on the demand side, i.e., by household computers.In the classic approach, an energy price signal is sent by the electric utility to thehouseholds, which, in turn, optimize the cost of consumption within their constraints.Instead of an energy price signal, we claim that an appropriate power signal that istracked in L1-norm as close as possible by the household has favorable character-istics. We argue that an interior point of the household’s feasibility region is neveran optimal price-based point but can result in a L1-norm optimal point. Thus, pricesignals can not parametrize the complete feasibility region which may not lead to anoptimal allocation of consumption.We compare the price and power tracking algorithms over a year on the base ofone-day optimizations regarding different information settings and using a large dataset of daily household load profiles. The computational task constitutes an embarrassingly parallel problem. To this end, the performance of the two parallel computation frameworks DEF [1] and Ray [2] are investigated. The Ray framework is used to run the Python applications locally on several cores. With the DEF frameworkwe execute our Python routines parallelly in a cloud. All in all, the results providean understanding of when which computation framework and autonomous algorithmwill outperform the other.