Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (450) (remove)
Institute
- Wirtschaft (134)
- Forschungszentrum Mikrotechnik (104)
- Forschungszentrum Business Informatics (67)
- Technik | Engineering & Technology (55)
- Department of Computer Science (Ende 2021 aufgelöst; Integration in die übergeordnete OE Technik) (54)
- Forschungszentrum Energie (51)
- Soziales & Gesundheit (51)
- Forschungsgruppe Empirische Sozialwissenschaften (22)
- Didaktik (mit 31.03.2021 aufgelöst; Integration ins TELL Center) (20)
- Josef Ressel Zentrum für Materialbearbeitung (15)
Language
- English (288)
- German (160)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Laser ablation (8)
- Entscheidung (6)
- Evolution strategy (5)
- Schreibdidaktik (5)
- Soziale Arbeit (5)
- Volatile organic compounds (5)
- Y-branch splitter (5)
- Ausscheidung (4)
- Demand side management (4)
- Organisation (4)
The production of liquid-gas mixtures with desired properties still places high demands on process technology and is usually realized in bubble columns. The physical calculation models used have individual dimensionless factors which, depending on the application, are only valid for small ranges consisting of flow velocity, nozzle geometry and test setup. An iterative but time-consuming design of such dispersion processes is used in industry for producing a liquid-gas mixture according to desired requirements. In the present investigation, we accelerate the necessary design loops by setting up a physical model, which consists of several subsystems that are enriched by dedicated experiments to realize liquid-gas dispersions with low volume fraction and small air bubble diameters in oil. Our approach allows the extraction of individual dimensionless factors from maps of the introduced subsystems. These maps allow for targeted corrective measures of a production process for keeping the quality. The calculation-based approach avoids the need for performing iterative design loops. Overall, this approach supports the controlled generation of liquid-gas mixtures.
Measuring what matters
(2023)
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are generally defined as ‘any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else’. A broader definition of PRO also includes ‘any information on the outcomes of health care obtained directly from patients without modification by clinicians or other health care professionals’. Following this approach, PROs encompass subjective perceptions of patients on how they function or feel not only in relation to a health condition but also to its treatment as well as concepts such as health-related quality of life (HrQoL), information on the functional status of a patient, signs and symptoms and symptom burden. PRO measurement instruments (PROMs) are mostly questionnaires and inform about what patients can do and how they feel. PROs and PROMs have not yet found unconditional acceptance and wide use in the field of inborn errors of metabolism. This review summarises the importance and usefulness of PROs in research, drug legislation and clinical care and informs about quality standards, development, and potential methodological shortfalls of PROMs. Inclusion of PROs measured with high-quality, well-selected PROMs into clinical care, drug legislation, and research helps to identify unmet needs, improve quality of care, and define outcomes that are meaningful to patients. The field of IEM should open to new methodological approaches such as the definition of core sets of variables including PROs to be systematically assessed in specific metabolic conditions and new collaborations with PRO experts, such as psychologists to facilitate the systematic collection of meaningful data.