Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (68)
- Article (67)
- Part of a Book (13)
- Report (11)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Book (2)
- Working Paper (2)
- Other (1)
Institute
- Forschungszentrum Business Informatics (168) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (168) (remove)
Keywords
- Evolution Strategies (5)
- Volatile organic compounds (5)
- Constrained Optimization (4)
- Stress testing (4)
- Evolution strategies (3)
- Evolution strategy (3)
- Fragmentation patterns (3)
- Global optimization (3)
- Humans (3)
- Optimization (3)
Real-time measurements of the differences in inhaled and exhaled, unlabeled and fully deuterated acetone concentration levels, at rest and during exercise, have been conducted using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. A novel approach to continuously differentiate between the inhaled and exhaled breath acetone concentration signals is used. This leads to unprecedented fine grained data of inhaled and exhaled concentrations. The experimental results obtained are compared with those predicted using a simple three compartment model that theoretically describes the influence of inhaled concentrations on exhaled breath concentrations for volatile organic compounds with high blood:air partition coefficients, and hence is appropriate for acetone. An agreement between the predicted and observed concentrations is obtained. Our results highlight that the influence of the upper airways cannot be neglected for volatiles with high blood:air partition coefficients, i.e. highly water soluble volatiles.
Verstärkt der Handel mit Agrar-Derivaten die Preisschwankungen von Agrar-Produkten? In der politischen Diskussion wird diese These oft als Grund für eine strenge Reglementierung des Handels mit Agrar-Derivaten angeführt. Hier diskutiere ich die Voraussetzungen, auf denen verschiedene Argumente für diese These beruhen. Eine zentrale Rolle dabei spielen die Begriffe von Gleichgewicht und Selbstreferenz. Diese Begriffe spielen in der Logik und der Physik eine wichtige Rolle, haben aber in der Ökonomie erstaunliche Konsequenzen.
For a given set of banks, how big can losses in bad economic or financial scenarios possibly get, and what are these bad scenarios? These are the two central questions of stress tests for banks and the banking system. Current stress tests select stress scenarios in a way which might leave aside many dangerous scenarios and thus create an illusion of safety; and which might consider highly implausible scenarios and thus trigger a false alarm. We show how to select scenarios systematically for a banking system in a context of multiple credit exposures. We demonstrate the application of our method in an example on the Spanish and Italian residential real estate exposures of European banks. Compared to the EBA 2016 stress test our method produces scenarios which are equally plausible as the EBA stress scenario but yield considerably worse system wide losses.